Archive for the ‘Public Sector/Government’ Category

Calling for a new moral contract for the Canadian Federal Public Service

December 11th, 2011 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Democracy, Public Sector/Government, Trust

“Canada needs to set ground rules for a new “moral contract” between ministers, public servants and Parliament because the existing rules are too weak to stop the partisan exploitation of the bureaucracy, says a former senior bureaucrat who helped write some of those rules.”

On Authenticity: How the Truth can Restore Faith in Politics and Government

November 25th, 2011 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Democracy, Public Sector/Government, Trust

I suggest you read the transcript from this year’s Gordon Osbaldeston Lecture given by Allan Gregg Gregg’s thesis can be summed up as civil society (elected officials, public servants, and citizens) need to be more authentic.His lecture “On Authenticity: How the Truth can Restore Faith in Politics and Government” provides a perspective on the relationship between authenticity and trust. Gregg posited that if our political leaders were to act authentically and speak truthfully, Canadians would be more inclined to trust them regardless of whether or not they agreed with their politics.

Public funds wasted on mining ‘counsellor’ Watchdog only valuable if it protects Canada’s reputation, betters industry

November 16th, 2011 by admin | 6 Comments | Filed in Business Ethics, CSR, Public Sector/Government

Ottawa Citizen’s Kate Heartfield’s piece on a Canada’s mining sort-of-ombudsman who’s had two cases in two years, one of which died when the mining company pulled out. “That’s what you get when you can only investigate parties who consent to be investigated.”

Op Ed: Suzuki’s moral relativism on ethics of oil doesn’t stand up

October 10th, 2011 by admin | 1 Comment | Filed in Business Ethics, Ethical Development, Public Sector/Government

This piece appeared in today’s Edmonton Journal.They note that it is”encouraging to see David Suzuki, the godfather of Canada’s environmental left, is finally willing to start thinking about the ethical implications of our oil sources. It would be more encouraging if he were willing to acknowledge, as almost any reasonable Canadian will, that some oil-producing countries still behave far more ethically than others.”
Anyone have a point of view they are willing to share?

So Much For Transparency

June 18th, 2011 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Public Sector/Government, Trust

National Post · Jun. 18, 2011 | Last Updated: Jun. 18, 2011 4:07 AM ET

Former auditor-general Sheila Fraser’s final report on the budget for the G8-G20 summits revealed a severe lack of oversight on government spending. First, Ottawa grossly overestimated the costs of the summits, obtaining spending approvals far in excess of what was necessary. Second, the federal government spent money earmarked for “border security” on beautification projects in the riding of now-Treasury Board President Tony Clement -even though his electoral district of Muskoka lies nowhere near any border. The spending, said Ms. Fraser, showed the need for better controls on how Parliament spends money.

Regrettably, Ms. Fraser’s admonishments appear to have gone unheeded by both the government and opposition parties. A scant eight days after she issued her report, the House of Commons unanimously passed a motion which reduces scrutiny of $250.8-billion in government spending estimates for the coming fiscal year.

These estimates are usually subjected to review by 24 House committees, to determine their validity. Instead, according to a reports, only one committee will conduct a two-day symbolic review of the quarter-trilliondollar spending authorization. The House Government Operations and Estimates Committee will review all 519 pages of estimates and a report on its work will be “deemed” to have been submitted by Monday, June 20, even if it has not in fact been issued.

This is as unacceptable as it is hypocritical. Despite the campaign rhetoric from every party about strengthening our democracy and the need for more accountability, they are now blithely changing their tune in the name of expediency. Most curious is the behaviour of the opposition parties, who not only provoked said election over ethical issues, but specifically over the issue of transparency relating to the government’s failure to adequately divulge the cost of some its crime bills.

Yet now NDP and Liberal MPs seem perfectly content to work with unscrutinized figures, so long as they can get the report out of the way in time to begin their summer vacations as scheduled.

As for the government, not only did it support the Estimates motion, but on June 17 it was revealed that the Prime Minister’s own bureaucrats are failing to follow proper approvals procedure for expenses. An audit of 2,100 hospitality claims by staff in the Prime Minister’s and Privy Council offices found employees routinely failed to obtain preapproval for their expenses, as required by House rules.

We would like to politely remind our elected officials that ignorance is not bliss -especially for taxpayers who end up footing the bill for their failings.

Integrity Complaints Against Municipal Politicians

May 12th, 2011 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Organizational Ethics, Public Sector/Government, Social Media, Trust

Withdrawal of a public complaint is certainly a right, but the issue is what if this is done out of fear of retribution? What does a municipal Integrity Commissioner (IC) do if the complaint has merit but is withdrawn because of fear of loss of job or a contract? The letter of the law in the Province of Ontario, Canada, would suggest that the complaint stops immediately in its tracks, as would be the case if a court suit was initiated. But the spirit of the law could be that the topic be pursued as an investigation by the IC acting in the public interest. After all, it is the public interest that is being served by the office of the IC.

For three timely articles on this subject intended for the professional organizational ethicist, see the Municipal Integrity Webzine Newsletter, released today, at http://ethicscan.ca/news.html?hc2=3.. This and all issues at directly downloadable for free

Candour and Trust

September 6th, 2010 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Business Ethics, Decision Making, Organizational Ethics, Public Sector/Government

Trust is understood as the sin qua non  in the relationship between the political and civil service communities in Canada and according to an article appearing in the  the Ottawa Citizen there is much work to be done. The current loss of trust is costing Canada billions.

The Christian Science Monitor also considers the issue of candour and corporate behaviour .

I am beginning to think that we have not made much progress on this issue in spite of all our efforts to consider the  values and ethics dimensions of our decisions.

Why and How the Millennial Generation Is the Most Pro-Government Generation and What This Means for Our Future

July 29th, 2010 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Public Sector/Government

The Center for American Progress (CAP) found that millennials, defined as Americans between the ages of 18 and 32, have far greater faith in and expectations of government than their older compatriots. This proved true regardless of political affiliation or ideological bent

OECD Working Group on Foreign Bribery has issued a Good Practice Guidance relating to anti-bribery.

June 12th, 2010 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Codes, Corruption, Organizational Ethics, Public Sector/Government

My friend Donna Boehme is looking for feedback. She wrote to me as follows:

“You have probably seen the news that the OECD Working Group on Foreign Bribery has issued a Good Practice Guidance relating to anti-bribery compliance programs. Joe Murphy and I have been participating in this process, and Joe represented SCCE in the Working Group’s programs as a Consultative Partner; we both attended the Dec 9 launch of the GPG by OECD in Paris. We believe this standard actually offers a very useful template for all types of compliance and ethics programs. It has the enormous advantage of being the first truly international standard, since it has been signed off on by the 30 OECD countries plus 8 other signatories to the anti-bribery convention. In a sense it is the “global sentencing guidelines” in terms of its potential impact globally. I have attached our comment draft, which we are circulating broadly for review and comment, including to the OECD and US Sentencing Commission. I’d be interested in any thoughts/input on the draft. Please also feel free to share it with anyone you think might share the interest. We think this OECD Guidance has tremendous potential to expand what was started by the US Sentencing Commission further onto the global stage.

Cheers, Donna

[email protected]

Document is here:

http://www.slideshare.net/secret/fRbbfO2VaEPgyN

Ethics Cannot be Taught

June 7th, 2010 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Codes, Public Sector/Government

In today’s Toronto Sun, Peter Worthington concludes that  ethics cannot be taught.Commenting on Justice Oliphant’s recommendations that public servants (and MPs) get better ethics training,Worthington notes that” a case can be made that “ethics” are something that you either have, or you don’t have… All the training, teaching, studying, reading, or lectures in “ethics” will not make a person more ethical if he or she does not have these core values to begin with.”

This used to be one of those black and white issues for me. Of course you can teach people to be ethical.Now I am am not sure Is it true that without an established set of  core values as a foundation,any ethical constructions that are built will not be long lasting?